5G/6G Non Terrestrial Networks (NTN)
                            NetSim's NTN Library features standards based simulation of non-terrestrial networks (NTN),
                    allowing users to:
                    
                    
                - Model end-to-end, full-stack, packet-level simulation of 5G NTN based LEO/MEO/GEO satellite networks
- Evaluate satellite network performance for various parameter configurations - orbit heights, elevation angle, number of spot beams, frequency reuse factor, etc.
Standards and Architecture
- Based on 3GPP TR 38.821 standards for single satellite simulation.
- Supports both transparent (bent pipe).
- Configurable orbit heights: LEO, MEO, GEO with adjustable UE elevation angles.
 
                Specifications
- Located outside service beams
- Communicates via feeder link
- Handheld devices operating in FR1
- VSAT terminals connecting in FR1 or FR2
- 5G core and remote servers
- Single satellite with fixed-earth spot beams. In earth-fixed beams, the satellite beams are steered such that they always point to the same location on earth
- Options for 1, 7, or 19 beams.
- 7-cell setup: Central hexagonal cell with 6 adjacent cells
- 19-cell setup: Two layers of surrounding cells around a central hexagonal cell
- Mapping of satellite beams to terrestrial cells is one-to-one. Each beam is one physical cell; we therefore refer to cells and spotbeams interchangeably.
- Configurable inter-beam distances
- Frequency reuse configurations supported: FR1 and FR3
- Link budget calculations following TR 38.821 Section 6.1.3.1
- Satellite antenna pattern modeling with circular aperture reflector antenna
- Interference modeling with user-configurable CIR
- Link budget variations can be simulated by configuring parameters such as:
                            - Satellite altitude
- Environment (rural, urban)
- LOS probability
- Antenna parameters
- EIRP
- Elevation angle
- Interference
 
- Movement of terrestrial devices
- Shadow fading
- FR1 bands: n254, n255, n256
- FR2 bands: n510, n511, n512
- Single beam with full bandwidth
- Connects gateway and satellite
- Multiple spot beams covering service area
- Bandwidth dependent on frequency reuse factor
- Satellite antennas use a circular aperture model with configurable aperture radius (in meters).
- Support for Omni directional antennas (Handheld UEs)
- Circular aperture antennas (VSATs and Satellites)
- Antenna gains per TR 38.811 - Section 6.4.1
- MCS mapping based on SINR and channel configuration
- Free Space Path Loss (FSPL)
- Atmospheric loss: user-defined (in dB)
- Clutter loss based on TR 38.811
- Shadowing: log-normal (user configurable)
- CIR-Based Interference Model
- Exact Geometric Interference Model
- Throughput, Latency, Error ... and more.
- Overall network metrics and per beam/cell & per application performance metrics
- Detailed Packet Trace
- SINR, SNR, Rx power
- Slant height, Elevation angle
- EIRP density, Thermal noise
- Angular antenna gain, UE Rx antenna gain
- Interference power, Pathloss
- Shadow Fading, Clutter loss, Additional loss
- CQI, MCS
Network Components
gNB:
Device Support:
Spot Beam Configuration
Link Budget Calculations
Supported Bands
Link Specifications
Feeder Link
Service Link
Antenna Configuration
Modulation and Coding
Propagation Models
Interference Modelling
Measurements and Analytics
Radio measurements logged every TTI
 
                Featured Examples
Impact of LEO Altitude Variation on SNR and Pathloss
- 
                        Analyze how LEO satellite altitude affects signal quality (pathloss and SNR) across two frequency bands.
- S-band (2.185 GHz): for handheld UEs
- Ka-band (18.75 GHz): for VSAT terminals
- 
                        Simulation Setup
- Altitude range (km): 300, 600, 1200, 1500, 1800, 2100
- Environment: Rural (outdoor)
- Pathloss model: Free space
- 
                        UE Types
- S-band → Handheld UE (0 dBi gain)
- Ka-band → VSAT UE (30 dBi gain)
- As satellite altitude increases , Pathloss increases steadily due to longer distance between satellite and UE.SNR decreases because the signal received at the UE becomes weaker.
- Ka-band experiences higher path loss than S-band. This is due to the higher frequency of Ka-band, which naturally suffers more free-space attenuation.
- Despite higher path loss, Ka-band shows higher SNR. This is because VSAT terminals (used in Ka-band) have high receive antenna gain (30 dBi),Whereas handheld UEs (used in S-band) have no antenna gain (0 dBi), resulting in lower SNR.
 
                    SNR Variation Across Outdoor Scenarios with Varying Transmit Power
- To evaluate how SNR (Signal-to-Noise Ratio) varies in rural vs. dense urban environments based on Transmit Power
- 
                        Observations
- SNR increases with EIRP and Tx Power in both rural and dense urban environments.
- Rural areas consistently show higher SNR due to lower clutter and environmental loss.
- Dense urban areas have much lower SNR because of obstructions, NLOS, and higher clutter loss.
- Even with the same power level, urban scenarios need more transmit power or beamforming to achieve the same performance as rural areas.
 
                    Extensions
- Cyber Attacks: See cyber for various network attacks supported in our other libraries. Most can be ported to NTN with minor code modifications.
- AI/ML: See 5G DL power control using RL and 5G delay constrained throughput maximization on how we can have RL in the loop
Limitations and Assumptions
- Satellite orbital motion is not modelled, since beams are fixed earth.
- Inter satellite communication is not available.
- HARQ disabled at gNB and UE.
- RLC UM mode only
- O-RAN CU-DU-RU split is not modeled.
- Terrestrial Networks - NTN coexistence and handovers not currently available
- Perfect Doppler compensation in the devices. Doppler, however, is an active area of R&D for us. If you have specific requirements, please let us know.